Carrie, I enjoyed your post on single-sex schools. Perhaps
the most important point (and one you touch on) is the fact that students in
single-sex schools will not have the opportunity to interact with children of
another gender at an early age. The individuals I have met in the past who have
come from boys’ schools (individuals whose parents eventually decided to move
them over to traditional public schooling) had little idea with how to treat
girls. They fluctuated between being afraid of women and acting rather chauvinist
(to put it lightly). In talking with friends at girls’ schools, the lack of boys
simply provided a ripe breeding ground for near man-worship. In short, “deprivation”
(though that’s a bit dramatic) leads to obsession, so I’m going to have to
disagree with you on the “less distractions” bit. The lack of interaction also
leaves both sexes with little understanding of how to deal with attraction and
removes a forum (school) in which boys and girls can come to view each other as
individuals, not some vague object of their desires. Personally, I think same-sex
schools would make girls more vulnerable to teen pregnancy.
In my mind (and in the mind of parentingteens.about.com),
the best way to deal with teen pregnancy is in the home, by encouraging
interests outside of boys (sports, art, drama, etc.), teaching your children
about contraception, convincing them of their own self-worth, providing them
someone with whom to talk to about their problems, and imposing discipline when
necessary. It sounds a bit old-fashioned and naïve, but it worked well enough
for my family.
No comments:
Post a Comment